Quote from: Altema on September 28, 2021, 01:44:28 PMQuote from: JimInPT on September 25, 2021, 09:43:14 AMYes, Jim is absolutely correct. I was using an aftermarket controller, and the Rad motor handled all that power fine. The nominal rating of a motor is the amount of power it will handle at 100% duty cycle without exceeding thermal gain parameters. It's science, and going on "looks" is not.Quote from: DickB on September 23, 2021, 03:39:37 PMQuote from: Altema on September 23, 2021, 02:04:34 PMThere is no reason in the world for anyone to freak out over this, because it will handle 1641 watts all day long and deliver 104nm of torque.I question your 1642W figure. The controller does limit power to the motor to 750W.
Dick, I believe Altema has upgraded his controller to 35A and was using that to drive the stock motor. In his other thread comments, he said he was actually testing to see if he could fail the stock motor with 1,600w input and could not - the motor is fine.
By the way, attached is a screen capture from the video of one of my acceleration test runs, with the Rad motor peaking at 1746 watts.
Question for you Altema. My Rover 5 has the stock motor but I upgraded to the Bolton controller which really increases output. Do I need to be careful not to burn out this 500 watt motor?